Pete Sampras: ATP Year-End No.1 for SIX Consecutive Years! 1993-1998

15 nov. 2020
19 411 Vues

A streak that will be difficult to replicate...one of the great achivements in the career of Pistol Pete Sampras! SUBSCRIBE to our channel for the best ATP tennis videos and tennis highlights: frworld.info

Watch official ATP tennis streams from every tournament: tnn.is/FRworld
Tennis TV is the OFFICIAL live streaming service of the ATP Tour.
Tennis TV features live streaming and video on demand of ATP tennis matches in full on PC, Mac, mobile & tablet apps on iOS & Android. Download the app to stream on your device: tnn.is/FRworld
Plus Tennis TV is also available to stream tennis on your TV on Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Samsung Smart TV, LG Smart TV, Android TV, PlayStation 4, Xbox One and Chromecast.
#tennis #tennistv #sports

Commentaires
  • Missed Wimbledon final against Rafter

    ali usmanali usmanIl y a 21 heure
  • GOAT 1. Nadal 2. Sampras 3. Federer

    commenzatorcommenzatorIl y a 10 jours
  • *PETE THE GREEK*

    TheMustermann487TheMustermann487Il y a 10 jours
  • Sampras when he was on his game..... simply beautiful to watch... Even his Defense was Offense most matches... lets all stop debating on who the best ever is and just appreciate Sampras for what he was.... an Amazing Tennis Player that was brilliant to watch.

    Eliath84Eliath84Il y a 13 jours
  • Did Andre A. Say “F me!”? At 4:26?

    Alex SottilAlex SottilIl y a 13 jours
    • That was hilarious 😅 poor old Agassi.

      Precession Of The EquinoxesPrecession Of The EquinoxesIl y a 23 heures
  • NOVAK also 6 time....2021

    nenadnenadIl y a 14 jours
    • Novax will never beat Peres record of 6 consecutive year ends at number 1

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • rafa novak and young lions🦾🦾🦾very strong

      nenadnenadIl y a 13 jours
    • @nenad on peter sampras era with a lot faster courts which it was easier as an underdog to make an upset he wouldn't do shiet against so many serve and volley players...The slow courts meta since 2002 are protecting the "big" 3's baseline pushing grinders for decades now.

      PaloukotisPaloukotisIl y a 13 jours
    • @nenad it doesnt matter competition is weak

      PaloukotisPaloukotisIl y a 13 jours
    • @nenad ir doesnt matter back then masters used to be like Grand slams of 5 games and they were fewer and didnt pay much like masters of today.

      PaloukotisPaloukotisIl y a 13 jours
  • what is it with these crowds and cheering early?!?!?

    JKJKIl y a 14 jours
  • Ladies and Gentlemen: 11:07 Sampras with his signature Slam Dunk

    Pablo EscobarPablo EscobarIl y a 14 jours
  • 4:57. Agassi > Sampras. Always was. Too bad about all the drugs and emotional stuff that flattered Sampras in that era.

    Ciaron SmithCiaron SmithIl y a 15 jours
    • you're like in every Sampras video just to point out that Agassi > Sampras. I like Andre but it's like you have his nuts so far down your throat I'd be concerned over the lack of oxygen. Take a break from posting.

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 11 jours
    • @TheSupineSmokey13 Indeed, a much better all court game, hence the better overall record against Agassi. You can't be the better player if your only option is to stand back all day and hope to hit all of your returns and passing shots in without any mistakes. Nothing to do with drugs and other excuses.

      Burns TennisBurns TennisIl y a 13 jours
    • Sampras was better had the better all court game. But Agassi will always have winning all four majors over him

      TheSupineSmokey13TheSupineSmokey13Il y a 14 jours
  • Sampras speed was insane 8:56

    Antoine LAntoine LIl y a 15 jours
    • yes that was very underated nowadays, when he was in his mid 20s his speed was a joke. When he won his last slam in 2002, his speed was gone, still won it by big serve and volley game

      Samprase 1Samprase 1Il y a 7 jours
  • Back when T- Shirts were Real Baggy.. Tennis Royalty..

    Kewsi YehboahKewsi YehboahIl y a 15 jours
  • Pete is Fantastic!

    Sterling Yap Soon AikSterling Yap Soon AikIl y a 15 jours
  • when american tennis wasnt just all serve.

    Yosh TYosh TIl y a 15 jours
  • Dominating the 90s using a tiny PS 85. The GOAT!

    Vaughn Marc ArayVaughn Marc ArayIl y a 15 jours
    • Almost everyone had tiny rackets back then :)

      Muneeb IMuneeb IIl y a 14 heures
  • @8:30 they really played "we are the world" lol I think I was in 5th grade when that song was popular .. looking back on it I bet he wishes they didnt play that old ass jam

    Johnny BJohnny BIl y a 15 jours
  • All done with an Eastern forehand grip as opposed to the extreme Western grip infecting tennis now.

    binkyxz3binkyxz3Il y a 15 jours
  • Tennis famous Legend greatest Pete Sampras's record champion got 1stRank time sixth on 6 year. 🙋‍♂️🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆👍👌🤝👏👏👏

    Rajashekar GRajashekar GIl y a 15 jours
  • I just realized: one shot Sampras never really used, despite having virtually all shots in his arsenal, is the drop shot.

    Antoine LAntoine LIl y a 15 jours
    • In the nineties, you didn't need the drop shot in your arsenal if you were an offensive player: the drop shot is most effective when played inside the court, but when you were inside the court back then, the better option was to go to the net if you were good at it. Nowadays, going to the net has become much more dangerous because of the new strings. Most offensive players play mostly from the baseline, so the drop shot has become a good option for them to shorten the rallies and win the points, especially since good passing shots or lobs are easier to play now (in case the drop shot is not a winner). They need the drop shot to be at the top of the game.

      AlecAlecIl y a 10 jours
    • he did use it, but not very often. When he did use it, it was with quite mixed results. I'm guessing he wasn't too confident at it and thus didn't go for it often. As was pointed out already, though, his drop volley was very good.

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 11 jours
    • I remember he would do it from time to time on hardcourts but not often. I remember a forehand drop shot winner against Moya at the 1997 Aussie Open final.

      Burns TennisBurns TennisIl y a 13 jours
    • @Paul Davey I started thinking about his speed mid way through the video and it amazes me to my very core ,and his passes from backhand cannot be hit without a stable base and his speed enabled him to reach to the ball a fraction faster .

      RAVI RATHEERAVI RATHEEIl y a 13 jours
    • @Paul Davey it is especially impressive in that shot 8:56

      Antoine LAntoine LIl y a 15 jours
  • Definitely could be considered the best player ever. Takes your breath away. He was a genius, an incredible athlete, and cool under pressure.

    Daniel ZajicDaniel ZajicIl y a 15 jours
  • Good video. Tennis is not only the Big 3 and the boring GOAT debate.

    Priva BonitoPriva BonitoIl y a 15 jours
  • The young tend to convince themselves that their era of players are the best. No intellectual honesty or life experience to help them with their thought process.

    Shawn HodginsShawn HodginsIl y a 15 jours
    • Sampras era was far more diverse and Pete really was dominant! The modern tennis novax fanboys are constantly pushing this weak era nonsense, but let’s be fair novax wouldn’t be up the top in real fast courts...

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @biff tannen I'm a millenial who grew up watching Federer-era tennis, went back and realized I prefer 90s tennis and players like Sampras. But yeah, in general, people tend to prefer their own era and the players they initally grew up with.

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 11 jours
    • Correction, the old and the young. The majority (if not all) of people will always favor their own era.

      biff tannenbiff tannenIl y a 13 jours
  • Sports are entertainment.... They are scripted.... Records are manufactured on computer screens and on paper much before the actual performance...

    Danish MukhtarDanish MukhtarIl y a 15 jours
    • You understand nothing, and convince yourself you understand a lot... You do not deal in reality enough. Stop the mind games, put your phone/computer down and try as tennis racket or a book or even talking to a real human!

      Shawn HodginsShawn HodginsIl y a 15 jours
  • 1 Sampras

    Marijo dadicMarijo dadicIl y a 15 jours
  • Important to remember that Agassi could've finished at #1 in 1995 but decided that he didn't deserve it after losing the U.S Open Final to Sampras. You'd never see players do that these days.

    Ben FaulknerBen FaulknerIl y a 15 jours
    • Because men understands that one stat means nothing without context. While certain serb doesn't even grasp that concept.

      Alexander KingsAlexander KingsIl y a 15 jours
    • I have watched the match. Pete Sampras simply outplayed him.

      Sterling Yap Soon AikSterling Yap Soon AikIl y a 15 jours
  • 6:00 Sampras bh

    Marian PalkoMarian PalkoIl y a 16 jours
  • Some of those years were jokes, Del Potro in 2009 amassed more points than Sampras in 1998 for example who ended #1, how embarrassing, the state of the top players.

    The Great OneThe Great OneIl y a 16 jours
    • @ben gray for example i lost to Thivessen at the end of 2017 in 3 sets.and he was Nr7 in 35+ ranking in august 2018.

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
    • @ben gray i lost to nr 700 ATP in 3 sets in team match.so i can play tennis.and you is a only beginner,you hit the bal to close to you body

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
    • @Monsta Andy looking at your vids I can see that you’re a liar 🤣

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @Monsta Andy you’re embarrassing yourself kid, just like every other clueless Novax glory supporter

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @ben gray Ha ha ha!ich play tennis very well for a hobby player.

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
  • 2:40 back when Nokia was important.

    krafthundkrafthundIl y a 16 jours
  • Everyone sayin Sampras 6 consecutive is more impressive how??? Who were his rivals?? Who challenged him??? Djoker may have not finished no.1 consecutive 6 years but still his path was way more difficult as he done that in RF and RN era.

    Mahesh GuptaMahesh GuptaIl y a 16 jours
    • yes.Djokovic won in 2009 much more than Pete in 98 and was only nr.3

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 15 jours
    • Im a Djokovic fan but i think Federer being number 1 for four straight years is more impressive. Yes Sampras was six times in a row year end, but thats being good at the right time, Roger was good all the time in those four years until Rafa took that spot away from him

      Paulo TorresPaulo TorresIl y a 15 jours
    • Dude when djoker really started winning majors federer was old and injured and nadal was always injured. Pete sampras had to face some of the best tennis players of all time

      Josef dubowskyJosef dubowskyIl y a 15 jours
    • All the opponents he beat apart from Pioline were Slam winners and appears in another Slam finals. Pioline himself appeared in two Slam finals. Even the Big 3 does not have this claim. They all beat a one slam finalist. Every era is different . The surfaces and balls used were so distinct back then. The games were big contrasts. Every one stays back now and grinds from baseline

      Vijay ShankarVijay ShankarIl y a 16 jours
    • andre agassi, Boris Becker , Patrick Rafter y Jim Courier estuvieron en la epoca de sampras, tampoco fue facil, en esa epoca a los norteamericas les importaba el tenis, eso lo hacia de altisimo nivel, pero ahora ya no les interesa tanto y eso tambien hace que el nivel de dificultad baje, incluso en el USOPEN ni en cuartos de final se les ve.

      Andres castañedaAndres castañedaIl y a 16 jours
  • Agassi at 4:24 always cracks me up 😂

    David HarmsworthDavid HarmsworthIl y a 16 jours
    • @Internaute "F*ck me"

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 11 jours
    • What does he shout ?

      InternauteInternauteIl y a 16 jours
  • Pete Sampras: at his peak, he was devastating on both the first and second serves. Sampras serve was arguably his best weapon (perhaps second only to his attacking style of play), Sampras had such a fluid and relaxed motion that allowed him to hit such a heavy ball with huge amounts of spin which made it both difficult to read and even harder to return with any purchase on it. It was also so good in the clutch moments.

    Suat Kaya tennisSuat Kaya tennisIl y a 16 jours
    • @nakluv and if I recall right, they are using faster balls on (at least some) clay tournaments. All of this leads to a "homogenization" of the surfaces. Either way, I'm not sure what your problem with Sampras is. His game was about as powerful as could be during his era, among all his contemporaries who played under the same conditions. I watched the exhibitions he played vs Federer in 2007/2008 and he was still serving & hitting hard, his serves were still faster than a lot of the players on tour these days, and those matches were played with the heavier balls as far as I know. Sports science has advanced a lot however, training regimens, diet, etc etc all is improved so it's not surprising if modern players can hit harder.

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 5 jours
    • @nakluv it's both. It's the balls AND the surface. Wimbledon is not the "same grass". If I recall right, they changed it to perennial rye grass in 2001 which both commentators and players have remarked as playing slower.

      Hehehehe hahahahaHehehehe hahahahaIl y a 5 jours
    • Ball should have stayed light. Today's grinders would be bad in his superior era of multiple tennis immortal gods.

      Michael GarzaMichael GarzaIl y a 6 jours
    • @Hehehehe hahahaha "Wimbledon when it was reported a few years ago that cans were opened before the tournament to reduce the pressure of the balls, and counteract the effectiveness of big serving. Tim Henman made comments about that. Serves seem faster than ever but as we know, that’s timed straight off the racquet but will slow through the flight, as it reaches the returner, the returner has more time to get into the point, especially as guys are not coming in to put away volleys anyway." it's the balls

      nakluvnakluvIl y a 11 jours
    • @Hehehehe hahahaha Balls speed and bounc changed game, not surface...wimbledon grass is the same.....

      nakluvnakluvIl y a 11 jours
  • 1990's the most dominant decade for American tennis in history.

    W CheemaW CheemaIl y a 16 jours
    • for americans👍

      nenadnenadIl y a 13 jours
    • i worked as a coach at the 93 US Open - Sampras bt Pioline - he was next on the practice crt after I had finished working with my player - I asked his group if they were ok if i stretched court side, yes fine. What was scary was the pace and weight of his slice b-hand. We all knew about the serve & f-hand but his slice b-hand was a joke - 6 inches over the net, 6 inches from the sideline like a bullet - ball after ball & this was his defence!

      Paul DaveyPaul DaveyIl y a 15 jours
    • @Paresh Mathew no slam winner Singles ATP.. Since A- Rod at US Open 2003.. Oucccch..

      Kewsi YehboahKewsi YehboahIl y a 15 jours
    • Nope, I still think there was more talent in 2000s..

      Paresh MathewParesh MathewIl y a 15 jours
    • @jacokyle01 ​ @jacokyle01 I meant so many top American player not just one. Early 90's was dominant by Jim Courier, Micheal Chang challenged Sampras in 96 for no 1. Andre Agassi winning few slams till mid 90's then late 90's by winning 4 majors out of 5 between 1999 and 2000, Todd Martin played Sampras in Australian Open final, if no top American reached finals of a slam then Mal Washington came out of no where and reached Wimbledon final. Last time American won a slam is 2003 and last time American reached a grand slam final is 2009.

      W CheemaW CheemaIl y a 15 jours
  • Best recovery in tennis by Becker after slip 07:24

    W CheemaW CheemaIl y a 16 jours
  • Great record from Pete even the big 3 can’t catch that record to finish the year number 1 6 times in a row

    Jonathan TerrettJonathan TerrettIl y a 16 jours
    • @brij mehta Djokovic won in 2016 muc more than Pete in 98 oder 96

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 15 jours
    • @Jonathan Terrett That too because Djokovic had way too many points to defend from 2015 which were humanly not possible.. And plus Djokovic didn't end his 2016 that well!!

      brij mehtabrij mehtaIl y a 16 jours
    • @Wat Tambor the only player I know that has finished year end number 1 the last 16 years is Murray pure dominance

      Jonathan TerrettJonathan TerrettIl y a 16 jours
    • Mostly because they beat each other

      Wat TamborWat TamborIl y a 16 jours
  • The better 6 times in a row

    Rodrigue JamesRodrigue JamesIl y a 16 jours
    • @ben gray who are another great tennis players in 98?How many big tournaments won Sampras in 98?How many big tournaments won Djokovic in 2016.Ask me to this!

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
    • @Monsta Andy lmfao, so you’re saying that for one year all competition left the sport? Wow you really are thick as 💩

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @ben gray even Sampras won in 2000 more than in 98 and was only nr.3.he just had no compretition in 98

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
    • @Monsta Andy no such thing as no competition, you really are a clueless novax glory supporter

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @ben gray no.that means that Pete had no competiton in 1996 and 1998 (he won only 3 big tournaments in 2 years) and Novak more than 10

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 2 jours
  • Tennis TV pls give me a like on this video. I'm your fan from india

    Trishay RaiTrishay RaiIl y a 16 jours
  • Just incredible that Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have been able to equal and even surpass Sampras's records!

    Jack MessentJack MessentIl y a 16 jours
    • @krafthund if you are looking at it in a time frame he is probably higher than that . Only the duration of the top 3 exceeds Sampras records

      A MA MIl y a 2 heures
    • @nakluv you’re clueless, guarantee you’re a novax fanboy

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @krafthund you’re clueless kid

      ben grayben grayIl y a 2 jours
    • @TheSupineSmokey13 Bull***! Becker is noting better than Raonic...Rest is top 10, but belove today big 2

      nakluvnakluvIl y a 14 jours
    • @nakluv no competition ? You're talking nonsense Becker,Edberg,Chang,Agassi,Courier,Kafelnikov,Kuerten,Kraijeck he had plenty he was just that good

      TheSupineSmokey13TheSupineSmokey13Il y a 14 jours
  • Now this is the real record. Not Djokovic's YE #1 in a pandemic year, where he was defaulted, destroyed in RG final and throwing his last match in Vienna.

    Rocko BalboaRocko BalboaIl y a 16 jours
    • Djokovic won in 2020 more than Pete in 1998.

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 15 jours
    • Lol.Djokovic won in 2009 much more than Pete in 98 and was only nr.3

      Monsta AndyMonsta AndyIl y a 15 jours
    • Come on man if you criticize Novak's year end then criticize Rafa's RG. Your comment makes no sense. He earned it. He made the most points in the year if you look at it that way as well.

      Paulo TorresPaulo TorresIl y a 15 jours
    • @Rocko Balboa been a rafa fan since i started watching tennis but i guess u know me more than i know myself you clown. toxic fans like you are whats wrong with sports. can never give any player appreciation without you talking about other players. rafa is the best for me but novak is right up there with him.

      Colonel GibbsColonel GibbsIl y a 16 jours
    • Great record from Pete but learn to respect Novak he made mistakes this year of course so you have never made a mistake before everybody has even Federer and Nadal

      Jonathan TerrettJonathan TerrettIl y a 16 jours
FRworld